Image : http://www.flickr.com
Grey's Anatomy has been an incredible success. While a medical dramas of the best bets are in the TV section formula, Grey's Anatomy from the beginning seemed to be a pallid and banal repetition of the formula. A profession that seemed out of fashion section cut from an old Sears catalog, with stories hyperbolic screams and medical codes and demanding many CC is full of mysterious substances. Oh, let that 'paddle' thing. But it was not long before they took off the heavy andFor good reason, the letter, in essence, very motivated story, and behind those pretty faces are solid actors, and emote Vogue.
After achieving success on a high speed, but a move is questionable for the series tries to do a spin-off. First, they have to win one of their favorite performances of dramatic dynamic planning, Dr. Addison Forbes Montgomery (Kate Walsh played brilliantly.) This undoubtedly leave a huge hole indramatic substance of the show. Subsequently, the creation of spin-offs are so contrary to the formula. Instead of filling the cast with talented "just met," Walsh cushions are a variety of stakeholders, including knowledge, Tim Daly, Chris Lowell and Taye Diggs.
Probably the biggest risk involved in this initiative is the effect of Grey's Anatomy himself. Were spin-offs fail, simply moving back Walsh of Grey's Anatomy can be an easy task. Walshso central to the budget drama Grey's Anatomy, that writers are certainly welcome to his absence by creating a new balance on the card. This could throw in the fact Grey's Anatomy will be deactivated. Enough that the show could also suffer, and eventually fail.
It 'impossible to say whether this will happen, but one thing seems certain. Third year of Grey's Anatomy seems all too early to have a spin-off.
Related : Television reviews TV buying guide
No comments:
Post a Comment